General Meeting Information

Date: April 10, 2018
Time: 3 - 5 p.m.
Location: ADM 109

  • Agenda

    Time Topic Purpose Discussion
    3:00 - 3:05 p.m. Approval of notes - March 20, 2018 A
    • Espinosa-Pieb
    • Nguyen
    3:05 - 3:40 p.m. Budget Update  I Espinosa-Pieb
    3:40 - 4:15 p.m. Review/Discussion of Faculty Ranking D  All
    4:15 - 4:45 p.m. Review/Discussion of Programs D All
    4:45 - 5:00 p.m. IBT Meeting Schedule Discussion D All

    A = Action
    D = Discussion
    I = Information

    Admin Reps Classified Reps Faculty Reps Student Reps
    • Christina Espinosa-Pieb, Co-Chair
    • Moaty Fayek
    • Coleen Lee-Wheat
    • Anita Muthyala-Kandula
    • Lorrie Ranck
    • Thomas Ray
    • Margaret Bdzil
    • Precious Gerardo
    • Lorna Maynard
    • Anu Khanna
    • Amy Leonard
    • Rick Maynard
    • James Nguyen, Co-Chair
    • Mary Pape
    • Erik Woodbury

    Visitors: Mary Kay Englen, Dana Kennedy, Lisa Markus, Mallory Newell, Dawn Lee Tu

  • Minutes

    Meeting Items

    Christina Espinosa-Pieb

    James Nguyen

    Administrative Reps: Espinosa-Pieb, Kandula, Ranck, Ray

    Classified Reps: Bdzil, Gerardo, Lorna Maynard

    Faculty Reps: Khanna, Leonard, Rick Maynard, Nguyen, Pape, Woodbury

    Absent: Fayek

    Guests: Alicia Cortez, Mary Kay Englen, Dana Kennedy, Lisa Markus, Mallory Newell, Elias Kamal (DASB)

    Approval of Notes

    The notes from March 20, 2018 were approved.

    Budget Update

    Espinosa-Pieb informed the team that after the Board meeting on April 2, 2018 because of continued enrollment decline the new reduction target to the instruction is $3.375M. Instruction should have a reduction plan in place for the next two fiscal years by the first week of May.

    She noted than any filled position will not be eliminated before July, 2019.

    Review/Discussion of Faculty Ranking

    Espinosa-Pieb displayed Faculty Reduction Ranking 2017-18 outcome for the teams to review.

    The team were missing a vote at the start of the meeting and it came in during the meeting and was incorporated into the faculty list and programs for further consideration.

    The team is likely would review a list of recently retired faculty.

    Article 18 assignment doesn’t qualify because it is a ten years assignment.

    The committee affirmed by vote the IPBT’s decision to send the first ten positions on the list for a permanent reduction to College Council’s review and approval.

    Review/Discussion of Programs

    The handout with 18 identified programs has been distributed and examined.

    Espinosa-Pieb asked everyone to review the document and suggest any corrections/changes. The goal is to come up with a list of the programs and recommend them to the viability committee.

    Espinosa-Pieb recapped the Viability process. The viability committee is not an open meeting to the public.

    The viability committee consists of: Academic Senate Leadership, Vice President of Instruction, VP of Student Services (if has impact), curriculum co-chair, the faculty curriculum chair co-chair, the articulation officer and FA reps.

    She also stated that the discontinuance of any program could take up to two years to phase out, while suspension of classes in the class schedule could occur in fall.

    IPBT will further review the results and make recommendations of the selected programs to the viability committee.

    IPBT Meeting Schedule Discussion

    The team decided to have an extended (3:00-5:00 pm) IPBT meetings for the next four to five weeks.

Back to Top