General Meeting Information

Date: November 13, 2018
Time: 4 - 5 p.m.
Location: ADM 109

  • Agenda

    Time Topic Purpose Discussion Leader
    4:00 - 4:05 p.m. Approval of Notes 11/6/18 A  Pape
    4:05 - 4:30 p.m.

    Program Review - Update to questions

    I/D/A Break into groups for discussion
    4:30 - 5:00 p.m.

    Resource Request Allocations

    I/D/A Break into groups for discussion

    A = Action
    D = Discussion
    I = Information





    • Lorrie Ranck, Co-Chair
    • Sam Bliss
    • Alicia Cortez
    • Moaty Fayek
    • Anita Muthyala-Kandula
    • Thomas Ray


    • Margaret Bdzil,
    • Anthony Caceres (Precious Gerardo on leave)
    • Lorna Maynard
    • Diana Alves de Lima
    • Rich Booher
    • Milena Grozeva
    • Anu Khanna
    • Rick Maynard
    • Mary Pape, Co-Chair
      Erik Woodbury
    • Brandi Madison
    • Ian Robertson
  • Minutes

    Meeting Items

    Co-Chairs: Lorrie Ranck (administrator), Mary Pape (faculty)

    Administrative reps: Sam Bliss, Moaty Fayek, Anita Kandula, Thomas Ray

    Classified reps: Margaret Bdzil, Anthony Caceres, Lorna Maynard

    Faculty reps: Diana Alves de Lima, Rich Booher, Milena Grozeva, Anu Khanna, Rick Maynard, Erik Woodbury

    DASB reps: Brandi Madison, Ian Robertsson

    Apologies: Alicia Cortez

    Guests: Anne Argyriou, Randy Bryant, Mary Kay Englen, Dana Kennedy, Paul Klingman, Dawn Lee Tu, Coleen Lee-Wheat, Mallory Newell, Miguel Cerda (La Voz), My Do (La Voz)

    Approval of notes

    The notes from November 6, 2018 were approved.

    A question arose regarding the due date for Football program. Lorrie Ranck notified everyone that she is working on the date to reconvene Viability Committee. Her intention is to meet in early December and once Viability Committee convenes she will bring it back to IPBT for approval.

    Program Review – Update to questions

    Coleen Lee-Wheat provided a brief overview on the critical Program Review aspects for Certificates and Degrees, Enrollment, CTE programs, Equity that the committee should consider when reviewing the programs. She advised the team to focus on making a sustainable process of resources allocation.

    Program Review ->-sustainable process -> criteria, purpose, improvement, funding -> Certificate/Degree (# of completion), Enrollment, CTE, Targeted Groups

    The teams should think and ask questions helpful to IPBT and the departments to understand the progression in terms of success rate, equity and enrollment. What types of questions should the team ask for this information?

    • The College is getting funding based on the number of certificates the departments awarded.
    • Enrollment - How significant is the enrollment change?
    • CTE programs – get mostly certificates and degrees (75%)
    • Equity goal reminder - where students are disproportionally impacted, and IPBT’s goal to address the gap between the success of certain student populations.
    • What questions can we ask to encourage the departments to discuss for these goals.

    The working groups were confirmed and established.

    IPBT members broke in small groups to develop the questions for the departments to ask.

Back to Top